RE: «Meet Hive's Plutocracy»

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

It is simple in my opinion. If you have certain expectations from witnesses, just unvote the ones that don't reach that expectation and vote the ones that do. IMHO active governance voting (including DHF) is what brings change or encourages growth if any.



0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

This. The bar is so low it should be easy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Simply downvoting in my opinion doesn’t help the community to improve as much as discussing what you consider to be issues worth discussing about. Unvoting is always an option but talking is better than simply voting or unvoting

0
0
0.000
avatar

Not sure what downvoting has to do with it as you can't downvote witnesses.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Wrong word, I meant unvoting, English is not my first language and even though I am fluent I slip sometimes, my bad

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, unvoting is possible, but democracies need dialogue and discussion so discussing about it is even more helpful than downvoting because you can either convince or be convinced or reinforce your ideas that made you either vote or unvote

0
0
0.000