RE: 9 January 2025, @mariannewest's Freewrite Writing Prompt Day 2612 | Prompt: the worst result (Part 5 - Conclusion) ENG/ESL
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I am grateful for the time you have taken to find these, @justclickindiva . Having now read through them, yes, sadly, they are just more evidence for why I have chosen to remove my investment from this blockchain. The best way I can characterize these types are "self appointed" which I suppose was an inevitable part of having a decentralized blockchain.
But is it really "decentralized"? In the absence of any true form of governance, where we could actually vote for our representatives based upon something other than how big their stake (how much money they have) is in the Hive blockchain, I do not see how this gets any better. Literally a (very?) small handful of people control most of what is going on ... They are effectively unaccountable to anyone else and God only knows the best way to characterize their relationships with each other ...
Please forgive me, if I have "dredged up" some unpleasant memories. I truly wanted to just let you know I appreciated your thoughtfulness this morning. Having taken money "out of the equation," I am free now to just try and support people here and there. I do value loyalty and integrity. I suppose that is what keeps me going somewhat ...
Self appointed is exactly the term for loss of a better hierarchy that no one agreed upon. Not unpleasant memories. Just a sad state of affairs if this perceived "justice squad" is allowed to flourish and new members joining are exposed to it OR, word is spread outside of the internal "foolery". I just can't understand why those self-appointed don't see the potential damage to the brand they profess to love so much.
It truly boggles the mind. Take care.
!LADY