avatar
"People have only as much liberty as they have the intelligence to want and the courage to take." - Emma Goldman
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Dead account - follow @matt-archy
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Hive's #1 Censorship Resistant Video Platform
LIST Power
28.62531415
Vote Value
0.00201363
avatar
|| Oregonian || 30y/o || Rollerblading || Laissez Faire || Libertarian || Free-Market Capitalist ||
LIST Power
6.6611701
Vote Value
0.00046858
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Building a Culture of Consequence
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Hive badge with all the accounts listed in the News page
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
This Is My Journey - My Content Is Not Financial Advice. Co-Founder @ThreeSpeak - Upvotes/Reblogs are not endorsements.
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
The Path to Enlightenment | Link in Bio
LIST Power
67.97455712
Vote Value
0.00478164
avatar
Libertarianism is based on the "Non-Aggression Principle" (the NAP), which means that you have the liberty to do whatever you want, so long as you don't initiate force or fraud against another individual, or their property. Non-aggression is not to be confused with pacifism. So long as you don't initiate force, you have the natural right to violence in self-defense. Just not to initiate aggression against another individual. Disproportionate violence in "self-defense" is obviously also a type of aggression (an initiation of force), so chopping someone's feet off for accidentally stepping on your shoe is obviously not a right. Libertarianism doesn't care if you choose to form a workers' co-op (à la Pierre-Joseph Proudhon), a communist commune (à la Kropotkin), or otherwise enter into any voluntary arrangement or contract -- such as *free trade commerce* (à la Ludwig von Mises), loans, employment, etc -- so long as any of these arrangements are voluntary. Specifically, libertarianism doesn't give any exception to the 'NAP'. Not to gangs calling themselves "government". Nor, to "democracy," or some mythical "social contract," or any other type of so-called "greater good." The Individual -- and individual liberty -- is not a means to any end; Consent is the means, and the end, to any legitimate social endeavor.
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
avatar
Co-creator of @peakd long time professional Photographer
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0
LIST Power
0
Vote Value
0